Suchergebnisse

Funding for open access publishing: Universidad Pablo de Olavide/CBUA. This study was funded y the project FEDER UPO-1380782 financed by the regional government of Andalucía, Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Trasformación Económica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades and the project PID2020-114975RB-100/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. ; This research was carried out with the aim to evaluate the anaerobic digestion (AD) of llama and dromedary dungs (both untreated and trampled) in batch mode at mesophilic temperature (35 °C). The biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests with an inoculum to substrate ratio of 2:1 (as volatile solids (VS)) were carried out. The methane yield from trampled llama dung (333.0 mL CH4 g¿1 VSadded) was considerably higher than for raw llama, raw and trampled dromedary dungs (185.9, 228.4, 222.9 mL CH4 g¿1 VSadded, respectively). Therefore, trampled llama dung was found to be the best substrate for methane production due to its high content of volatile solids as well as its high nitrogen content (2.1%) and more appropriate C/N ratio (23.6) for AD. The experimental data was found to be in accordance with both first-order kinetic and transference function mathematical models, when evaluating the experimental methane production against time. By applying the first-order kinetic model, the hydrolysis rate constants, kh, were found to be 19% and 11% higher for trampled dungs in comparison with the raw dung of dromedary and llama, respectively. In addition, the maximum methane production rate (Rm) derived from the transference function model for trampled llama dung (22.0 mL CH4 g¿1 VS d¿1) was 83.3%, 24.4% and 22.9% higher than those obtained for raw llama manure and for raw and trampled dromedary dungs, respectively. ; Universidad Pablo de Olavide de Sevilla. Departamento de Sistemas Físicos, Químicos y Naturales

The table olive industry produces a high quantity of wastewater annually. These wastewaters are very problematic because of their characteristics of high organic matter, high phenolic content, high salinity and conductivity. The quantities in which they are produced are also a serious problem. The worldwide production of table olives reached 2,550,000 tons in the last five campaigns, with the European Union contributing to 32% of total production. The problem of these wastewaters is focused on the Mediterranean area where the highest quantity of table olives is produced and to a lesser extent on the United States and South America. Countries like Spain produce around 540,000 tons of these wastewaters. At present, there is no standard treatment for these wastewaters with acceptable results and which is applied in the industry. Currently, the most common treatment is the storage of these wastewaters in large evaporation ponds where, during the dry season, the wastewater disappears due to evaporation. This is not a solution as the evaporation ponds depend completely on the climatology and have a high number of associated problems, such as bad odors, insect proliferation and the contamination of underground aquifers. Different studies have been carried out on table olive wastewater treatment, but the reality is that at the industrial level, none has been successfully applied. New and promising treatments are needed. The current review analyzes the situation of table olive wastewater treatment and the promising technologies for the future.

Introducción: La necesidad de estándares de calidad de los servicios farmacéuticos, para garantizar el uso seguro, responsable y efectivo del medicamento, ha hecho que a través de los años se produzcan una serie de cambios en los sistemas sanitarios. Existe además, una lucha para posicionar a la farmacia y a farmacéuticos como ejes potenciales para promulgar la protección de la salud. Fruto de estos cambios, se evidencian diferencias estructurales en los modelos de farmacia entre países desarrollados y países en vías de desarrollo. El presente estudio realiza un análisis comparativo del modelo de oficina farmacia entre los países de Ecuador y España, diferenciando las legislaciones alusivas al funcionamiento de las farmacias y comparando los modelos de oficina de farmacia. Método: Estudio comparativo basado en investigación documental, en lo referente a normativas y legislación de las farmacias comunitarias de Ecuador y España Resultados: En el presente trabajo se analizan la legislación vigente que regula la farmacia española y ecuatoriana, en referencia al establecimiento de nuevas farmacias, propiedad farmacéutica, prohibición de cadenas de farmacia, así como la calidad de la formación del farmacéutico comunitario Conclusiones: En países de Latinoamérica, como en el caso de Ecuador, la farmacia adopta un modelo más liberal, refiriendo a la desregularización de la apertura de nuevas farmacias, temas de propiedad, sistema de planificación territorial, así como la no presencia del profesional farmacéutico; dando lugar a un sistema con un fuerte enfoque comercial; incidiendo de esta forma sobre la función ideal que debe llevar a cabo la farmacia comunitaria. ; Introduction: The need for quality standards in pharmaceutical services, that provides a safety, responsible and effectiveness use of medication, has led several changes in health systems over the years. There is also a struggle to position the pharmacy and pharmaceutical professionals as potential axes to enact health care. As a result of these changes, there are structural differences in pharmacy models between developed and developing countries. The present study sets out to provide a comparative analysis of Ecuador and Spain pharmacy office model, differentiating legislations concerning the functioning of pharmacies and comparing the pharmacy office models. Method: Documentary based research and a comparative study, regarding regulations and legislation of community pharmacies in Ecuador and Spain. Results: In this paper, the current legislation that regulates the Spanish and Ecuadorian pharmacy is analyzed, in reference to the establishment of new pharmacies, pharmaceutical ownership, prohibition of pharmacy chains, as well as the quality of the training of community pharmacists. Conclusions: In Latin American countries, as in the case of Ecuador, the pharmacy adopts a more liberal model, referring to the deregulation of the opening of new pharmacies, property issues, territorial planning system, as well as the non-presence of the professional pharmacist; resulting in a system with a strong commercial focus; thus emphasizing the ideal role to be played by the community pharmacy.

Introducción: La necesidad de estándares de calidad de los servicios farmacéuticos, para garantizar el uso seguro, responsable y efectivo del medicamento, ha hecho que a través de los años se produzcan una serie de cambios en los sistemas sanitarios. Existe además, una lucha para posicionar a la farmacia y a farmacéuticos como ejes potenciales para promulgar la protección de la salud. Fruto de estos cambios, se evidencian diferencias estructurales en los modelos de farmacia entre países desarrollados y países en vías de desarrollo. El presente estudio realiza un análisis comparativo del modelo de oficina farmacia entre los países de Ecuador y España, diferenciando las legislaciones alusivas al funcionamiento de las farmacias y comparando los modelos de oficina de farmacia. Método: Estudio comparativo basado en investigación documental, en lo referente a normativas y legislación de las farmacias comunitarias de Ecuador y España Resultados: En el presente trabajo se analizan la legislación vigente que regula la farmacia española y ecuatoriana, en referencia al establecimiento de nuevas farmacias, propiedad farmacéutica, prohibición de cadenas de farmacia, así como la calidad de la formación del farmacéutico comunitario Conclusiones: En países de Latinoamérica, como en el caso de Ecuador, la farmacia adopta un modelo más liberal, refiriendo a la desregularización de la apertura de nuevas farmacias, temas de propiedad, sistema de planificación territorial, así como la no presencia del profesional farmacéutico; dando lugar a un sistema con un fuerte enfoque comercial; incidiendo de esta forma sobre la función ideal que debe llevar a cabo la farmacia comunitaria. ; Introduction: The need for quality standards in pharmaceutical services, that provides a safety, responsible and effectiveness use of medication, has led several changes in health systems over the years. There is also a struggle to position the pharmacy and pharmaceutical professionals as potential axes to enact health care. As a result of these changes, there are structural differences in pharmacy models between developed and developing countries. The present study sets out to provide a comparative analysis of Ecuador and Spain pharmacy office model, differentiating legislations concerning the functioning of pharmacies and comparing the pharmacy office models. Method: Documentary based research and a comparative study, regarding regulations and legislation of community pharmacies in Ecuador and Spain. Results: In this paper, the current legislation that regulates the Spanish and Ecuadorian pharmacy is analyzed, in reference to the establishment of new pharmacies, pharmaceutical ownership, prohibition of pharmacy chains, as well as the quality of the training of community pharmacists. Conclusions: In Latin American countries, as in the case of Ecuador, the pharmacy adopts a more liberal model, referring to the deregulation of the opening of new pharmacies, property issues, territorial planning system, as well as the non-presence of the professional pharmacist; resulting in a system with a strong commercial focus; thus emphasizing the ideal role to be played by the community pharmacy.